Date of Ranking: June 29, 2018
Rank | huID P-index
PGP Scoring and Ranking Project
This project is about the scoring and ranking of phenotypes and participants of the Harvard Personal Genome Project (PGP). The objectives are,
- Keep track of the phenotypes available from the PGP.
- Incentivize participants to contribute phenotypes and other data to their public PGP profile.
- Inform scientists world-wide about potential phenotypes and participants of the PGP for research purposes.
- Can be use as a tool to prioritize participants for sequencing, generation of cell-lines and other research endeavors.
How is the scoring and ranking done?
This section describes briefly the algorithm for scoring and ranking phenotypes and participants of the PGP.
Phenotype Score
The phenotype score indicates the number of PGP participants that provided a valid value for the phenotype. The higher the score implies more participants reported the status of the phenotype in their PGP public profile. Some of these phenotypes will be used as input to calculate the participant's P-index. Click here to see Phenotype Scores.
P-index
The P-index is a normalized score of every PGP participant and is used to rank the participants of the PGP. Briefly, participants gets awarded the number of points equal to the sum of phenotype scores that the participant has valid phenotypes for. The number of points is then divided by the theoretical maximum number of points (which is equal to the sum of all phenotype scores) multiplied by 100. This will result in a number from 0 to 100, where 0 indicate that the participant have reported no valid phenotypes while 100 indicate that the participant reported every scorable phenotype present in the PGP. Click here to see participant's P-indexes and rank.
Ranking Frequency
We plan to perform the ranking of the PGP every 2-3 months.
Uploading Phenotypes as a PGP participant
We welcome PGP participants to upload as many phenotypes as they are willing to contribute. The more phenotypes one has on their PGP profile, the higher one's P-index and ranking. Details can be found here.
Citation
To cite this work, please cite the following article,
Chan, Y. et al. An unbiased index to quantify participant's phenotypic contribution to an open-access cohort. Sci. Rep. 7, 46148; doi: 10.1038/srep46148 (2017)
Click here to access manuscript (open-access).
Funding
Support for this project was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (grant: 74178). The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation.
For more information, please contact Rigel Chan or Elaine Lim at pgpresearch@wyss.harvard.edu.